Students perform Covid tests on themselves despite fears about their effectiveness in self-administration.
Students at Oasis Academy in Coulsdon, Surrey were given the kits the Monday before the regime began.
Following the announcement of the last national lockdown, only vulnerable children or those whose parents are key workers were allowed to attend classes in person. However, figures suggest that up to 20% of students could attend schools.
They were given instructions by the nurses on how to conduct the tests themselves and were supervised by them, much like some walk-in testing centers operate.
The idea is that fewer medical experts or volunteers are needed so that more people can be tested more quickly.
But despite multiple studies, it comes to be seen that lateral flow tests – if self administered – could miss cases due to the force and depth required to collect a sample.
Experts recommend that a trained nurse or professional perform the swab insertion to get to the required site, which can be extremely uncomfortable.
Student Molly Tinker is taking a COVID-19 test at the Oasis Academy in Coulsdon, Surrey today
Student Ruby Soden receives instructions on how to self-administer her coronavirus test
Student Henry Parker is given instructions and equipment to perform his virus test
John Murphy, CEO of Oasis Trust, said on the Monday before the general school lockdown and closure, “We know for a fact that our young people, with their teachers and their friends in the classroom, are making the best progress in quality initial education.
& # 39; Therefore, we can be sure that mass testing in schools will give our children, parents, teachers and staff additional confidence and have the potential to significantly reduce learning disabilities alongside our existing Covid controls.
"In January we will be testing the tests in a number of our schools before implementing them in all of our secondary schools across the country."
Schools received extensive online training modules with 1,500 military personnel to provide advice and guidance on setting up the process.
Student Lily Mae Milliman is doing her COVID-19 test with a mirror to aid in using the swab
After use, the swab is placed in a reactant that will indicate if the user has Covid
The tests were mailed to schools before they closed under the UK's new lockdown
There is a concern that self-conducted testing may miss cases due to the depth of swab collection required
Professional swabs are longer and can be painful when administered by a nurse
Infectious disease specialists say it is more likely when people use swabs
Schools could still spread coronavirus
Covid-19 infections will continue to spread in classrooms where large numbers of children in lockdown attend schools, experts have warned.
The Independent Sage scientific advisory group is calling for the definition of key workers to be narrowed down and for those unable to work when there is a high demand for school places to receive more financial support or vacation.
The group of scientists, chaired by former scientific director Sir David King, warns that disadvantaged children are at a "higher risk of infection" due to the high number of students eligible to attend class.
The warning came after the government told schools not to limit the number of local key workers' children during the national lockdown in England – and it said vulnerable children should be strongly encouraged to attend.
School principals have reported high demand for places after students in schools and colleges – with the exception of children of key workers and vulnerable students – were instructed to study remotely until mid-February.
Children at risk may include "students who may have difficulty engaging in distance learning at home" because of a lack of equipment or a quiet space to study.
The Independent Sage report states: "First … this is undermining the whole school closure issue, making the policy less effective and thus increasing the closure time.
"Second, it puts disadvantaged children at an even higher risk of infection."
In response to high demand from key parents of workers, it added: "This risks increasing school attendance to such an extent that policies become less effective and undermine teachers' ability to provide distance learning . "
Independent Sage calls for the creation of a national education task force involving government, councils, teachers, parents and students to "create a more Covid-safe environment in schools".
However, experts warned last year that some self-tests are less accurate because they use shorter swabs and don't have to be inserted as deep into the nose.
And in December, a study in the British Medical Journal warned that the rapid test kits only detect 48.89% of Covid-19 infections in asymptomatic people.
The polymerase chain reaction test (PCR) is more accurate and has achieved better detection results.
The BMJ report states: "Innova Lateral Flow's SARS-CoV-2 antigen test failed to detect three out of ten cases with the highest viral load in preliminary data from field evaluation of tests in asymptomatic individuals."
The instructions for some tests say, "No force is required and you don't have to push far into your nostril."
However, professionally used swabs, which are much longer and designed to take samples from the "bottom" of the nose, can cause people to choke, water their eyes, or even nosebleeds if done properly.
Infectious disease specialists say people are more likely to make swabs themselves – which is notoriously difficult even for trained health professionals. False negative results mean that people infected with the virus are mistakenly told that they are in good health.
Under current UK guidelines, there is no rule to stay home after a negative test, even if they have symptoms. Medics say the UK is not keeping up with other countries like New Zealand – where the Covid-19 outbreak was quickly contained, making the tests less important and running them multiple times.
Norwich-based researcher Dr. University and College Union Equality Officer Katherine Deane is concerned about how effective infection control will be.
She told the Eastern Daily Press: "Schools do not have infection control experts, so the precision of the setup, cleaning of the area, wearing of personal protective equipment, and ventilation are all concerns.
“If you have a swab test it can lead to a cough – a gag reflex, and the droplets go up in the air.
“The big ones will fall quickly, but the good ones can stay in the air for up to an hour.
“And yet the idea of the test is that you have one student wipe it down, clean up, and five minutes later the next student gets tested.
"This means supervisors may have a higher risk of infection. If infection control is not done carefully, venues are at risk of super-spreader events happening."
Professor Jon Deeks, a biostatistics expert at the University of Birmingham, said: “A single negative test result does not rule out the disease. It's so easy to miss the virus – they give off a lot of false negatives. & # 39;
Research has shown that up to 30 percent of professional swab tests produce false negative results, meaning the number of positive cases may be underestimated by thousands.
It's not clear how imprecise self-smears are, even though they are done over 60,000 times a day in the UK. The Ministry of Health will not publish any data on the false negative rates of its tests.
PCR vs Lateral Flow Covid Tests
WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PCR TEST AND A LATERAL FLOW?
A PCR test can cost up to £ 180 per person with the swab being processed in a laboratory.
The UK on the other hand prefers faster tests that are not done in the laboratory and give a result within 15 minutes.
These rapid coronavirus tests, so-called lateral flow tests, can be carried out on site using portable devices.
They are faster and cheaper than the laboratory-based PCR tests that the government uses to diagnose people, but are less accurate.
LATERAL FLOW TESTS ARE FAST – BUT CAN Sacrifice ACCURACY
A lateral flow test uses a swab to take a sample from the person's nose or throat and then process it in a small machine that tries to detect the coronavirus by mixing the sample with something that the virus has would react.
If there is a reaction in the mixture, it suggests that the person is carrying coronavirus. If not, you will get a negative result. This process can be completed in just 15 minutes.
You take your own swab with you, although a specialist will process it through the machine on site.
The lateral flow misses up to half of the cases, as the Ministry of Health itself admits.
Damn evidence, however, shows they can be effectively useless in self-management, even though Downing Street's current testing scheme relies on people taking their own swabs.
Tests are more accurate when swabs are done by trained professionals as they have to be pushed deep into the nose.
Scientists fear, however, that the UK simply doesn't have the money or the free doctors to do it nationwide every day. Instead, health bosses are accepting DIY swabs to save time.
PCR tests can take several days to produce results – but they are more accurate
These lateral flow tests are different from the gold standard PCR test, scientifically known as the polymerase chain reaction test.
PCR tests also use a swab, which is then processed using high-tech laboratory equipment to analyze the genetic sequence of the sample and determine if any of them match the genes of the coronavirus.
This is a much longer and more expensive process that involves multiple types of trained personnel. The analysis process can take hours, with the entire process from swab to receiving the result taking days.
However, it is much more accurate. Under ideal conditions, the tests detect the virus with almost 100 percent accuracy, although this is closer to 70 percent in the real world.
This is comparable to a much lower sensitivity in lateral flow tests. One type of study used in Liverpool suggests that around 50 percent of people who would test positive with PCR would go missing.
WHAT'S THE ADVANTAGE OF THE LATERAL FLOW TEST?
Extreme accuracy can be a disadvantage for PCR because so many people have been infected. However, the tests can detect bits of virus in people who recovered weeks ago and are no longer infectious, which can result in them needing to isolate themselves unnecessarily.
Side flow tests are more likely to miss people carrying the virus, but experts say they have value in weeding out people carrying large amounts of the virus and therefore most likely to spread the disease.
(tagsToTranslate) Dailymail (t) Nachrichten (t) Coronavirus (t) Coronavirus locks