Shamima Begum's own attorney admitted today that "there is always a possibility" that the jihad bride poses a terrorist threat to the country she fled to Syria – but believes she should still return to the UK, to fight for their passport.
Tasnime Akunjee spoke out after the Supreme Court heard that the 21-year-old who fled was allowed to join IS when he was 15. Appealing against the decision to withdraw her British citizenship would be an "affront to justice".
Mr Akunjee told Good Morning Britain: "There is always a possibility (it is a threat) – but if you compare your situation to the brother of the Ariana Grande concert bomber, Mr Abedi, the UK government has put a lot of time and effort into to secure him in Libya and extradited to Great Britain to be tried on 22 murders. He will spend the next 55 years in prison.
Then he was asked by Susanna Reid if Begum should return to Britain, even if she posed a threat. He said: "The Court of Appeals has made it clear that if she returns to the UK, the Home Office will impose additional restrictions on her to mitigate potential threats."
The 21-year-old's case is under review by the Supreme Court after her British citizenship was revoked by then Home Secretary Savid Javid.
A decision will be made as to whether Begum, who is currently in the Al Hawl refugee camp in Syria, will be allowed to return to the UK to appeal his citizenship. Britain believes it is not stateless because people with Bangladeshi parents are granted citizenship of the South Asian country at birth.
British Jihadi woman Shamima Begum with her son Jerah (now deceased) in Al Hawl, Syria. She wants to return to the UK, where she has torn her citizenship
Yesterday the hearing was told that it posed a "clear and serious threat" to national security.
Government attorney Sir James Eadie QC said: “There is no basis on which to conclude that the risks it poses can be satisfactorily managed
& # 39; National security is at serious risk. Allowing the substantive appeal would not constitute an application of justice but an affront to justice. "
She was one of three Bethnal Green Academy students who left their homes and families in December 2014 to join the extremists.
She lived under IS rule for more than three years before she was found nine months pregnant in a Syrian refugee camp in February of last year.
At the start of yesterday's hearing, government attorney Sir Eadie QC spoke on what could happen if ISIS members return to the UK, using an MI5 threat assessment report.
He said, “The fact is that the threat is real and serious, despite the age of the individual when he traveled.
“The assessment is that those who have traveled to align and align pose a clear and serious threat, especially on return.
"Exposure of the public to an increased risk of terrorism in this case is not justified or appropriate for reasons of fairness."
He then referred to Begum's interview with a newspaper in 2019 and how she said she did not regret going to Syria.
Sir Eadie added: “Serious concerns about the threat of return underpin the disengagement.
“In particular, the aim of this measure is to make it very difficult for them to return because in that case they represent the kind of risks that you saw
"It is the responsibility of the state to protect its citizens from the threat of terrorism as much as possible."
"She married an IS fighter, lived in Raqqa – the capital of the self-proclaimed caliphate – and stayed with them for about four years, until in 2019 she practically left the last pocket of the IS territory in Baghuz."
In writing, Sir James said: “This case raises questions about the balance between the level of protection of procedural rights and the level of protection of the public from terrorism.
“Can it be right that a person who has become involved in terrorism and is now overseas and subject to restrictions that affect their ability to participate in domestic proceedings can rely on these self-created barriers to return? to insist in the jurisdiction? so that they can now participate in such proceedings?
"Can it be right that they should be able to do so when doing so directly runs counter to the most effective protection of the public from the risks of harm caused by terrorism?"

Begum (seen on the right) was one of three Bethnal Green Academy school girls who traveled to Syria

Begum was one of three girls from the Bethnal Green Academy who joined ISIS in 2014
Begum was one of three Bethnal Green Academy students who came to ISIS shortly after Sharmeena Begum, who is not a relative, traveled to Syria in December 2014.
Kadiza Sultana and Amira Abase, then 16 and 15 respectively, flew from London to Istanbul with Begum before heading to Syria.
Mr Javid revoked her British citizenship on national security grounds after she was found in the camp.
However, in July the Court of Appeals ruled that "the only way to get a fair and effective appeal is to come to the UK to pursue your appeal".
Lord Justice Flaux, who sat with Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Singh, said any decision must be weighed carefully
They added: "Fairness and equity must outweigh national security concerns in this case in order for permission to appeal to be granted."
Later that month, the Court of Appeals gave both the Home Office and Ms. Begum permission to bring her case to the UK Supreme Court.
It also ordered a "stay" with Ms. Begum's return "pending further order by the Supreme Court".
At a two-day hearing that began this morning, the Supreme Court will examine whether Ms. Begum can return to the UK to appeal the disfranchised British citizenship.
Five Supreme Court justices, led by the President of the Court, Lord Reed, will also consider whether Ms. Begum's appeal should be upheld if she is denied entry to the UK.
Also yesterday, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) will hear the cases of three people of British-Bangladeshi heritage whose British citizenship has been revoked on national security grounds.
SIAC – a specialized court that hears appeals to decisions to remove British citizenship on national security grounds – will hear appeals from two women known only as C3 and C4, who have also allegedly traveled to Syria from the UK to join IS .
At the same time, the tribunal will hear an appeal from a man referred to only as C7, whose British citizenship was revoked earlier this year after he too allegedly traveled to Syria to join ISIS.
All three claim the decision to remove their UK citizenship made them stateless and therefore illegal, which the Home Office has denied.
In Ms Begum's case, SIAC initially ruled that she “cannot play a significant role in her appeal and that the appeal will not be fair and effective in that regard” but said “it does not mean that her appeal will be successful”.
However, earlier this year the appeals court said, "It is difficult to imagine a case where a court has declared that we cannot have a fair trial, but we will move on anyway."
Ms. Begum was one of three Bethnal Green Academy students who left their homes and families to join IS shortly after Sharmeena Begum, who is not a relative, traveled to Syria in December 2014.

The girls flew from Gatwick to Istanbul and were then assisted by ISIS traders through Turkey to Syria
Kadiza Sultana and Amira Abase, then 16 and 15 years old respectively, and Ms. Begum boarded a flight from Gatwick Airport to Istanbul, Turkey, on February 17, 2015, before making their way to Raqqa in Syria.
Ms. Begum claims that she married the Dutch convert Yago Riedijk 10 days after arriving on IS territory. All three of her school friends are reported to have married foreign IS fighters as well.
She told The Times last February that she left Raqqa with her husband in January 2017, but their children, a one-year-old girl and a three-month-old boy, have both died since then.
Their third child died shortly after he was born.
The case continues.
(tagsToTranslate) Dailymail (t) News (t) ISIS (t) Priti Patel
Add Comment